Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksandr Dolgopolov Jr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Oleksandr Dolgopolov Jr

Froms speedy. The guy is marginally notable: he is a member of the National Davies Cup team and there are more than 16K ghits (together with his father) Alex Bakharev 11:19, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Not much information available, but David Cup asserts notability and his ATP rank was 328 in November 2006. [1] Should be enough for WP:BIO. Prolog 13:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Agree Davis Cup and ranking warrant a keep. Mayumashu 14:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - currently at number 266 in the world 1/1/07 Rankings, and number 2 in Ukraine - with a slightly different transliteration of his name, and on a Davis Cup team. - fchd 20:17, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, because of Davis Cup participation. He's young and prospective, so his notability will boost pretty soon. MaxSem 20:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - non (yet) notable. 266th is not enough. David Cup: I see Ukraine only in 2006 Davis Cup and on a marginal match, so definetly non notable. --Cate | _Talk 21:29, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keepi know that this article doesn't have to much info but i will try to get more as tennis season will begin ( especialy in Romania, where i am from).I first saw dolgopolov in september 2006 so i didn't get to put together to much info abt him but i am trying so plz keep this article.thank you Alina Rucai 14:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep International sportsmen no matter what their world ranking appear to be considered notable - indeed there is precedent for any professional sportsperson to qualify as notable. I don't agree with that but that's what we dod before so why not keep this one? Spartaz 18:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.