Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleg Voronoy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —freak(talk) 00:36, Sep. 24, 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Oleg Voronoy

DELETED BY AUTHOR. END OF DISCUSSION! :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilith angel (talk • contribs)

The page contains no useful information about its subject; most of the enigmatic text is copied directly from this ad, selling the Russian language book. Jim Douglas 04:16, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable author, unencyclopedic text, creation is the only edit by the author. Nope. - Richfife 06:10, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

• UnDelete Notable author. More than 424 entries in Google [1] and [2]. More than 8000 readers on-line [3] and [4]. Published books registered with Library of Congress ISBN: 1-4116-0995-6. Popular songwriter in Russia. [5]. Most of "enigmatic text is copied directly from" Wikipedia to LULU [6], not a vise versa. This article fully complies with “Biographies of living persons Policy”
  • Comment Most of those google hits are either (1) wikipedia mirror sites, or (2) lyric sites that end up at a dead end if you actually click through. I just tried to search for that ISBN. It's possible I entered it wrong, or did the search wrong, but it doesn't find anything. -- Jim Douglas 17:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment An ISBN # doesn't mean anything. Anyone can submit anything to the Library of Congress and they'll keep it for you and give you a # - Richfife 20:45, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment "Anyone can submit anything"? Way be correct, but any author who submits work to Library of Congress, think that his work is some contribution to the public. There is no "Anyone" and there is no "Anything". For every work allways some readers and some fans... and some people critics. Every one judges on level of they intelect.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilith angel (talk • contribs)

Reply I'm going to assume that the implied insult is a result of a language issue. The author's intent is of only minor importance. People write what they consider to be "the greatest book ever" every day. - Richfife 21:43, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Reply Richfife: I do not want to insult nobody here. Love! Peace!

• Delete Doesn't assert notability in article. JASpencer 16:59, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Can you define "Notability", since it is no Wiki Policy on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilith angel (talk • contribs)
    • Reply Wikipedia's Notability Page on People - Richfife 21:39, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Reply Lilith angel: Also on the WP:BIO page, see WP:AUTO (Has this been written by the subject or someone closely involved with the subject?) -- Jim Douglas 21:53, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
      • Reply Jim Douglas: Yes, this article has been written by the subject. I don't mind if you delete it, I'm not trying to achieve glory and recognition by submitting this article to Wikipedia. I was just submitting my BIO to Living Russian Poets, that’s it... Unfortunately in our time, most of the work published on Internet, in different languages and form, so “Notability” is the question. Are you “Notable” if you receive more than 100s emails a day from your fans? Do I really need Wiki for that? Was just wandering that you decided to delete it now, after this article been published for 6 month.
      • Reply Lilith angel: I honestly have no axe to grind here. I was clicking the 'Random article' link and this article happened to come up. The first thing I noticed was that the external link was for a personal photo site. That seemed a bit unusual, so I spent a few minutes looking around on google, and the only other link I could find was here. I was wondering, though; wouldn't readers of ru.wikipedia.org be more likely to be interested in Russian-language poetry? -- Jim Douglas 22:55, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
        • ReplyJim Douglas: It’s funny, but you hit my site right at the moment I was updating it. It is not personal photo site, but artists home. I just left the photos, since I have been asked by fans to keep photos while I do maintenance of the site. Look at the article again.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.