Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old School Gamers (forum)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Tony SidawayTalk 09:22, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Old School Gamers (forum)

Non-notable web forum. No link provided, and I couldn't find it on google. Mairi 00:14, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

That could be it. In which case the article isn't very accurate either. --Mairi 00:42, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete; Adv/linkspam | Celcius 01:11, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete: Preservation of the inane by the vain. Wikipedia is not a web guide. Geogre 01:32, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. I have welcomed the original editor of this and pointed them here, though from the history I'm not sure if they are still about. Alf 01:40, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Amren (talk) 02:16, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. -Aranel ("Sarah") 02:22, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete *drew 03:19, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete--Ryan Norton T | @ | C 04:42, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, based on extreme Alexa rank. - Mgm|(talk) 07:36, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
  • Extremely high Alexa ranking, Advertising. Delete Optichan 19:25, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

Leave it!-Gamers.com is a major forum, it is not all that much different than having an article on ebay or google. I'll admit Gamers is much smaller, but it is still there, and important to many people. - Josiah

  • Delete. --Agamemnon2 21:23, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.