Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Okopipi (software tool)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mailer Diablo 13:50, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Okopipi (software tool)

I nominated this article for deletion, I do not feel that this article improves the encyclopaedia. The article I nominated does not hold any references, or citations as to its importance. Apologies if I upset anybody. Cєlαя∂σяє^Talk 23:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep per citations to establish notability, as follows: CNet article VNUNet, Extensive writeup at techtarget.com. I am adding some or all of these to the article, though I don't think I'll be destubbing it (I have other things I'd like to get done today). If I may offer helpful advice, in the future it may be helpful to run a Google check first and see if you can improve an article before nominating for deletion; this saves time and effort compared to the cross-site editing that has to be done to complete an AfD nomination. Captainktainer * Talk 19:34, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Only a spammer or those in league with spammers

would want this article deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.197.236 (talk • contribs)

• Keep, per additions by Captainktainer. There would appear to be many other articles and references available that would satisfy WP:SOFTWARE - the ones he has listed are just the cream of the crop. Kuru ^talk 03:58, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - this shouldn't be considered a promotional page since it is just an open-source project. Also it is directly relevant to the article. If the project fails, then this article can be deleted. Eliot1785 ^talk 14:10, 19 July 2006 (EST)

By the way, I'm not a spammer nor in league with spammers... I just feel that this is an article for something that doesn't exist. Sure, we have articles that express ideas - I just feel this doesn't qualify. Don't get me wrong, I like the idea but there's not actually anything other than an idea going on. Cєlαя∂σяє^Talk 21:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - and let us hope the bird flies. - Kittybrewster 16:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - I learned about Okopipi and the previous project Blue Frog from Wikipedia. It made me interested in the problems of fighting spam emails. Very exciting information, definetely keep! --Xiulinhang 17:09, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.