Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Okahandja
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 03:26, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Okahandja
an unneccessary one-line definition of an insignificant place UkPaolo 15:50, 30 May 2005 (UTC) OK, agreed... Keep. I've just been reading about it on Google, and would agree the article is clearly worthy of being kept, although it is in serious need of expanding. Hedley - I'd never consider it insignificant solely based on it being in Namibia. UkPaolo 16:50, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, bordering on strong keep. Over 80,000 Google hits for "Okahandja". Just because its in Namibia doesn't make it 'insignificant' - It's the same size as a lot of US towns with articles. The article is very poor, and needs expansion without a doubt (substubs are gone which doesn't help), but the topic is notable. Hedley 15:55, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and expand. Actually, I'll probably expand it myself in a few minutes here. We need more African content on Wikipedia, not less. Scimitar 16:37, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Scimitar's stub and expand. Well done Scimitar. Capitalistroadster 00:51, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
- Strong keep (my vote would have been keep even without expansion) - good work that Scimitar. Grutness...wha? 04:58, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
- Keep by all means. - Mustafaa 18:47, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.