Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oink
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Pig. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Oink
Wikipedia is not a dictionary also, much of the page is unverified and Original research. This survived a VfD from earlier, halcyon days of Wikipedia's youth(2004), but as the standards for article inclusion have changed, this now needs to be revisited. A fun article, but really unneeded on Wikipedia. To see the earlier VfD, see the article's talk page. Jayron32 05:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. There's really not much else one can say about the term beyond the first sentence in that article. The rest looks like unverifiable original research. To the closing admin, would it be possible to move Oink (disambiguation) to Oink per disambiguation page guidelines? Axem Titanium 05:54, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge into Pig. –- kungming·2 (Talk) 08:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge into Pig using Rooster#Crowing as a good example. The current commentary at the end of the article is interesting, but not encyclopedic in tone. --Willscrlt 13:03, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Another example is Orgle (AfD discussion), which was merged into llama. Uncle G 13:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge into Onomatopoeia --RoninBKETC 15:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Lol Delete TSO1D 15:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge per Roninbk. Danny Lilithborne 21:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge and/or move to Wiktionary. -- Schnee (cheeks clone) 23:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge per RoninBKETC. WMMartin 16:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.