Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Office Interactive
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. --Fang Aili 說嗎? 22:53, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Office Interactive
Software company launched in 2004, no evidence of meeting WP:CORP, no sign of significance, has been prod tagged but tag removed. What little is verifiable seems insignificant. Just zis Guy you know? 21:45, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. -- Captain Disdain 22:24, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
This article seems as significant as Centraview, Compiere, and many other small CRMs that are in the List of CRM vendors. What makes this discription different from other CRMs? What makes a company eligible to be deleted when most of the companies on the CRM vendor list has never been heard of?Razwan
-
- Delete per nom, doesn't meet WP:CORP, violates WP:VAIN. That you might yourself have never heard of a company doesn't make it non-notable; heavens, someone tried to AfD a subsidiary of Mittal Metals last week. Be that as it may, we vote on AfD on an article's own merits. This one's merits are scanty. RGTraynor 22:56, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, nothing of note here. WP:CHILL until you hit WP:CORP guys. Deizio talk 02:07, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Deizio. --Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 12:18, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
- I heavily edited this article to create a neutral point of view but it seems that this article violates the WP:CORP as much as Vtiger CRM or Hipergate whose webpage visits is small See page count at bottom. It is one of few or only one that I was able to find on the wikipedia crm vendor list that is actually giving a free HOSTED version so what under the WP:CORP makes this less notable than lets say Hipergate?JMejia7704 21:21, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Wikipedia is not a free web host. Ardenn 04:28, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- ReyBrujo 06:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.