Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odette Bancilhon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Odette Bancilhon

Odette Bancilhon (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I can't find any sources that would verify this information or help me expand the article. FisherQueen (Talk) 18:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as unverifiable and failure of WP:BIO. Google hits on google.fr and google.com are all wiki mirrors. Eddie.willers 19:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep for Now - Having an asteroid named after her, and discovering one as well would mean a significant contribution to her field, thus passing BIO. I'll find a copy of Dictionary of Minor Planet Names, 5th ed.: Prepared on Behalf of Commission 20 Under the Auspices of the International Astronomical Union, Lutz D. Schmadel, ISBN 3-540-00238-3, which should verify the information. This means I have to get a library card. the_undertow ^talk 21:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep for now likewise. Google Books and Google Scholar confirm the existence of publications as O Bancilhon ([1] [2]) and under her married name in the journal Astronomischer Jahresbericht [3] and a joint publication [4]. Tearlach 03:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep on the basis of what Tearlach found, and that I just confirmed on the Astronomical Data System DGG
• delete per nomOo7565 18:31, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.