Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odd Jensen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  21:16, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Odd Jensen

From the text of the article, doesn't seem to be notable. Nonpareility 02:35, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, its vanity, look who made the page. Dinosaur puppy 02:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Gets 586 Google hits. —Khoikhoi 03:01, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Unfortunately CSD A7 doesn't apply to dead people. MER-C 03:21, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. wikipediatrix 03:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - not notable, appears to be written by family member Seaphoto 04:30, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator. Not notable, nor verifiable. Why doesn't A7 apply to dead people, just curious. RFerreira 08:51, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Probably it's just pure nonsense --Mecanismo | Talk 11:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No reason to doubt the intentions of whoever wrote this, but without notability I can't know -- I can't verify it. --Shirahadasha 22:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:BIO, Wikipedia is not a memorial. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 22:40, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Clearly it's nonsense. Allon FambrizziAllon Fambrizzi
• Delete. It appears real enough, but notability is not asserted in my view. Ohconfucius 02:00, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.