Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Observerspace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 15:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Observerspace

Observerspace (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Appears to be pure OR. No sources, highly dubious conclusions, zero mentions on arxiv.org or Spires. Bm gub (talk) 01:13, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - seems made up, and no sources (except Doug Adams, which doesn't count)--SevernSevern (talk) 01:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)(reformatted to close the bold tag - Eldereft ~(s)talk~ 19:26, 6 April 2008 (UTC))

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —Quasirandom (talk) 03:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. There is a place for the "shut up and calculate" school, but it is called positivism. - Eldereft ~(s)talk~ 19:26, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.