Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obolon' crater

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Daniel.Bryant 10:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Obolon' crater

Obolon' crater (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Is this spelt Obolon crater? If so, write it at Obolon. Montchav 14:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Spelling is Obolon' according to the Earth Impact Database which is taken as an authoritative source on impact crater names. I've added the crater at Obolon dissamb page. Zamphuor 01:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep: I have just added some references etc to the article to improve quality and make the information verifiable, but it remains a stub at the present like many other impact crater entries. Zamphuor 09:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
BTW this AfD debate really belongs under Category:AfD debates (Science and technology) because impact craters are geological features. Zamphuor 09:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep A 20 kilometer wide impact crater up for deletion? A physical feature like this is inherently notable. A very encyclopedic geological and astronomical topic. --Oakshade 04:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep: There are relatively few Earth impact craters, as compared to other geological features. Fewer than there are countries. So we've been going for completeness, and slowly filling out the stubs. --GregU 06:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep appears to have some notability.--Sefringle 05:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep: more than adequately meets notability criteria. -- The Anome 12:58, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep notable, several good sources cited. Hut 8.5 15:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per all. (Note the Cyrillic apostrophe in Ukrainian replaces the ь sign used in Russian.) --Dhartung | Talk 18:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. — RJH (talk) 20:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.