Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obatalian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:46, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Obatalian

Not sourced, probably a made-up term. Perimosocordiae 19:52, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Even if the information is correct, wikipedia is not a dictionary. Bucketsofg 20:16, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Kiaxx 01:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The information is correct to the best of my knowledge (though I don't know why it's spelled with an "l" rather than an "r"). But as stated above, WP is not a dictionary. -- Hoary 03:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - This is a real term, although the romanization is wrong. It is as valid an article as Moe, Otaku or any other Japanese word with its own entry. MightyAtom 12:20, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, since unlike "moe" and "otaku" this word does not have currency in English... and unlike those articles, this one defines a word rather than describing a cultural phenomenon (the latter belong in encylopedias, the former in dictionaries, and WINAD). — Haeleth Talk 09:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.