Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oakleaf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 00:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Oakleaf

There is too much nonsense in this article. Probably a non-notable person. Thue | talk 00:21, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. -- JJay 00:33, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nonsense, should have ben speedied once I added the nn-bio header. User:Zoe|^(talk) 03:11, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. NN, vanity, nonsense. — TheKMan^talk 06:20, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

I read this and thought it was hilarious. It´s all true, the "Oakleaf Hype" is becoming a mainstream cultural phenomena in all of Scandinavia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petter-e (talk • contribs) 00:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete. NN, vanity, not very creative for an artist. Billbrock 03:37, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.