Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oakland Raiders Starting Quaterbacks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. JERRY talk contribs 21:24, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Oakland Raiders Starting Quaterbacks

Oakland Raiders Starting Quaterbacks (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The page doesn't need to exist, a template like most NFL teams have could be created, but this page doesn't fit in with established NFL Quarterback precedent, if you will. CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 01:54, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Well by that shouldn't the Notre Dame Starting Quarterbacks page be deleted? G4raider 1-13-08 —Preceding unsigned comment added by G4raider (talk • contribs) 02:02, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it should be deleted. Instead there should be templetes for the two. Placed on the Raiders and Notre Dame football pages, respectively. --Niyant (talk) 02:09, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
I couldn't disagree more. Templates are fine if the list is a simple succession box. But if the page consists of tabular data that happens to be organized sequentially, there's nothing wrong with a list. -- Trowbridge (talk) 00:25, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete and what is a "quaterback"? Ix Dschubba 02:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete just a list; falls under WP:NOT. Name is misspelled in any event. JJL (talk) 03:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Er... Have you actually read WP:NOT? There's absolutely nothing on that page forbidding the usage of lists of people. If all such pages are in fact disallowed, you'd better go to Lists of people and get busy. -- Trowbridge (talk) 00:25, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Category or template creation would be more applicable in this case. Oh, and please use the correct spelling...— BQZip01 — talk 06:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. I second the creation of some sort of template. Doc Strange (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 17:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.