Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OQO Model 02

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Selket Talk 13:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] OQO Model 2

OQO_Model_2 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Article is not very significant other than being an example of the many small pcs in the world, and it is not the worlds smallest pc, the previous model was. In fact, the website states that the previous model was recognized by the Guinness Book of World Records as officially the worlds smallest fully functional pc [1] and it also says on the main page that this model is the "World smallest Windows Vista PC",because it is a bit bigger, but improved enough specs to run windows vista,which is less significant .Rodrigue 16:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. It's gained some notoriety in the review world. fethers 11:54, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment I realize that it is a pretty well known example of a UMPC and there is alot about it on the web, but since the previous model is still technically the worlds smallest PC, shouldn't that be an article, regardless of wether or not this is? Rodrigue 15:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. "Bill Gates demonstrated a pre-production OQO 02 Model 02 in his keynote address at CES 2007" I think that's sufficient assertion of notability, and it's gotten some press coverage. Someguy1221 22:18, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand the article's content. --Madchester 22:32, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment There seems to be a strong idea to keep it.But does anyone think that since the previous model technically is still the world smallest PC, that it shoudn't be an article as well?.Rodrigue 19:45, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Also the proper tittle of this article is Model 02, not 2, as its the term used by the company.And this model did not appear in mission impossible 3, it was the previous model, but that should have been obvious since mission impossible 3 came out last may, and this PC was released this January!.

And why has no one uploaded an image yet, even though there are plenty of them on the website.Instead someone on the talk page suggests adding an image even though they can do it themselves.

All that just shows how much people really care about this article.Rodrigue 21:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Merge and Delete Why not merge with OQO? It's already mentioned in that article and referenced from it. I say merge it and delete it.

Comment Well perhaps this article should be merged, but the other version is a world record holder so it is notable enough. Rodrigue 22:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Merge as per previous poster. Neither artcle is particularly long, merger would create a better article. vLaDsINgEr 21:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Or else merge AND redirect. Qaka 20:47, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect... to the section about this pc on the OQO page. This PC is quite notorious, but like the others in the line, does not deserve it's own page. --711groove 18:30, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • keep - I came here looking for this particular article. Not much there right now, but if you give it some time it will definitely be added to. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 21:22, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
comment - and by the way, the nominator hasn't even given an argument as to why the article should be deleted. If I was an admin I'd close this. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 21:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep or Merge - definitely notable, expansion could be helpful, or merge it into the main OQO article. --Bhtooefr 22:38, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.