Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O&S Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:59, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] O&S Group

Unverifiable, possibly hoax. See also Eli Oliveiro. --Vsion 05:51, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Vsion 05:51, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--み使い Mitsukai 05:59, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, Quickly and with extreme prejudice. TheRingess 06:01, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, per nom. Information is factually inaccurate and misleading. It links to the page "Eli Oliveiro" where copyrighted images are used without offical permission. Thank you. Dept. of Media Relations, Office of Eli Oliveiro. Solitudinal 06:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Procedural Comment. Speedy should not be applied, even if CSD are met. Between bouts of reverting related edits, i have been preparing aids for reviewing the situation. One facet IMO needing investigation is the relationship between

on one hand the {{Singnet}} IPs, oeo (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) (read "Office of Eli Oliveiro") and two other new registered editors, who have advocated for this article and Eli Oliveiro,

and

on the other Solitudinal (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) and the tumultuous sites www.o-eo.com and www.islamicgem.com.

One possibility is that the articles should be blanked (not deleted), and retained for the sake of the evidence their histories contain, after renaming them as subpages of the respective talk pages. (The redirects resulting from the moves of course to be deleted.)
--Jerzy•t 06:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as hoax or vanity article. *drew 07:49, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, hoax. --Terence Ong 09:51, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. At Talk:Eli Oliveiro i've added a list of the 4 new registered editors and 9 IPs who've been involved, and a chronology of edits for the 18 day period of edits, counter edits, and pauses. I am still not satisfied with my mental picture of it, and i would hope at least one or two editors who think they do have a clear picture, would test it by inspecting these tools, then report back. I'll be checking its accuracy soon, so watch that page for corrections if you see anything that seems significant to you.
  --Jerzy•t 10:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  
• Delete. not notable, if at all a real entity. __earth ^(Talk) 15:16, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete hoax, per nom

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.