Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nur für Deutsche

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. --ST47Talk·Desk 14:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nur für Deutsche

Nur für Deutsche (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Separate articles for every German slogan during WW2 are not needed. The bulk of this article is already in Racial segregation (which contains a specific section for the Nazi period) - any remaining content should be also placed into that article and this article deleted. 52 Pickup 12:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Redirect as per nominator. No need to duplicate stuff in various articles as it only makes updates more painful. -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 12:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Weak keep seems to be somewhat more complicated than the nominator suggests. The slogan is at present not even mentioned in the article on racial segregation, and the article on the phrase includes information that would not fit in the general article on segregation (e.g. subversive uses of phrase by Polish partisans). --Javits2000 15:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Keep - contains information not present (Partisan use) in proposed redirect article and which would not be appropriate in that article. The "similar signs" bit needs to be rewritten or deleted; however as it just consists of three random examples of similar racist prohibition signs. Bigdaddy1981 20:59, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan 15:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep The article seems to contain significant information, and the phrase appears to have been a common slogan. DGG (talk) 19:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.