Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nur Amalina Che Bakri

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 20:02, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nur Amalina Che Bakri

Hopelessly little content, non-encyclopedic and probably vanity. All this article tells of Nur Amalina Che Bakri is that he, or she, scored 17A1's, whatever that means, in the SPM exams, whatever those are. (The link goes to a disambig page). — JIP | Talk 08:46, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Say no for deletion please, because this is an important content. User:ARGOU 10:16, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • What makes it important? RickK 00:38, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for complete lack of context. Possible vanity. Also, having a certain score in an exam doesn't merit a wikipedia entry. Mgm|^(talk) 10:45, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Not vanity, but it's the highest score in the country I believe. She's on the local newspapers and news for these past few days but I'm sure that it'll fade eventually. Weak delete for topic being unencyclopedic. --Andylkl 19:40, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
  • Now if you could only tell me which country it is? — JIP | Talk 08:43, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • Ah... It's over here in Malaysia. --Andylkl 14:25, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
      • I'm changing my vote to delete because it is vanity and not encyclopedic. --Andylkl 09:07, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)
        • I agree, the expanded version is clearly vanity. It reads like Nur Amalina Che Bakri's entry out of a "my school friends" book. Wikipedia doesn't list what HRH Queen Elizabeth II's favourite music groups are, or whether she likes to chill out with her homies. So why should that info about a less notable person be encyclopedic? — JIP | Talk 08:28, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nice test scores are not inherently encyclopedic Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:33, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not encyclopaedic. Megan1967 23:03, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, speedily for little or no content, lack of context, else vanity. Wyss 03:14, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. RickK 00:38, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)
• Don't Delete, I know she's my very good friend and I have met her before. We also studied in the same school. 218.208.199.79User talk:218.208.199.79 08:08, 17 March 2005 (UTC)

I'm sorry but she doesn't deserve an article on Wikipedia just because of her SPM marks, highest ever or not. --Andylkl 09:09, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nur Amalina Che Bakri, again

The article has been rewritten after deletion, with identical content. I vote delete. — JIP | Talk 09:35, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• If the content is identical, it is an obvious candidate for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 09:51, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, and give a warning to the author. Phobophile 10:19, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I've already tagged it for speedy deletion and left a message on the author's talk page. — JIP | Talk 10:23, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.