Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Numerodix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Numerodix

Not notable hacker Alex Bakharev 11:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - no evidence of notability; unsourced except for the subject's own website. Walton monarchist89 11:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Hackers, by and large, are not notable, except where third-party reliable sources have reported on them (e.g. The Daily Mail, The Sun, The New York Times et. al). The subject's own website is probably not a reliable source. That's not to say the article isn't well-written, as it seems OK for an article, but it doesn't assert the subject's notability in any way. --sunstar net^talk 11:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:BIO. MER-C 12:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, per above. If the user becames a regular Wikipedian, it can be userified.-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  16:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.