Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuke Dukem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted. IrishGuy talk 01:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nuke Dukem

Nuke Dukem (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Speedy?Asserts enough notability to avoid CSD. Sounds, however, like a non-notable band that should be a quick delete —Gaff ταλκ 23:47, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

  • This is my first Wikipedia article, so it's rather poor. I'm writing this article for my band and is a satirical piece. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael lund wiki (talk • contribs) 23:50, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
  • "There is much controversy surrounding the origins of Nuke Dukem; It is the subject of much scientific and political debate" Unencylopedic rubbish realy IdreamofJeanie (talk) 23:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete, though it doesn't seem to fit any speedy criteria, it is rubbish. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Non-notable, makes no legitimate claims to notability, and is probably suitable for a speedy deletion. If for no other reason, it could be tagged for nonsense, since " One popular theory is that [the band] formed as a result of a volcanic explosion in the early seventies." Also, COI problems are obvious, since the first listed member of the band and the creator of the page, User:Michael lund wiki share an identical name. ◄Zahakiel► 00:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Creator admits its 'satire'. Hammer1980·talk 00:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
    • I have speedied. It qualifies under Nonsense. Admission of satire confirms it. Hammer1980·talk 00:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.