Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear pollution

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP as a redirect. -Splash 22:48, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nuclear_pollution

Very POV. A commentary. Not enough to salvage and merge with anything. Kushboy 07:35, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as original research/essay. Terminally POV. There wouldn't be anything left once it was excised. - Lucky 6.9 07:41, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
• Purificare and mergere with radioactive waste. --Merovingian (t) (c) 08:15, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as a redirect. User Alex Bakharev has now turned it into a redirect to Nuclear waste which is a logical destination should anyone search on this term. Tobycat 20:47, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as a redirect. Xaa 22:44, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as a redirect. Punkmorten 23:04, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: I support the redirect, but that should not have been done until the VfD was closed. -- Visviva 10:24, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.