Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 22:57, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Novick

Vanispamcruftvertisement by a comedian with only 65 Google hits, most of which are similarly self-promotional. Daniel Case 04:04, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment "Vanispamcruftvertisement" What sort of a neologism is that? Bobby1011 04:07, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

• Reply to comment by nominator: See WP:VSCA. Daniel Case 04:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Comment I've honestly never heared that term. Bobby1011 04:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Comment: That's why we defined it for you. Stifle 16:23, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete It's a good neologism. Describes exactly what this article is. Anabanana459 04:08, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Bobby1011 04:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and maybe redirect to Mike Novick. :P --Kinu ^t/_c 04:38, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per nomination ---J.Smith 04:42, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Pavel Vozenilek 04:43, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 07:38, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanispamcruftisment, nn. --Terence Ong 15:20, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 16:12, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Textbook case of Vanispamcruftvertisement. --Wingsandsword 04:07, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.