Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nour Malas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete for the reasons given below and in the deletion log summary. Uncle G 12:34, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nour Malas

Nour Malas (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Extreme verifiability problems, with a grand total of 11 ghits. Unreferenced possible hoax. Contested prod. MER-C 04:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete as per nom. Canadian-Bacon 04:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Well, that's my vote for wikipedia. I for one think that the article would be a great addition to the Uncyclopedia, and I have written on the creator's talk page to say as much. Esn 04:57, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete it is obviously a hoax ("raising an army to turn all the trees in the world pink?"). The level of the humor is not up to uncyclopedia, which is saying something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmz5 (talk • contribs)
  • Comment Hoaxes don't fall in to the acceptable criteria for speedy deletes, so the above vote will have to be reduced to delete. (aeropagitica) 05:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, not for Wikipedia please. Terence Ong 06:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. As the info in the article is unreferenced and derogatory and there are living (but unnotable) persons with this name, it should be speedied as G10, attack page, if not, speedied as G3, joke article vandalism per WP:VANDAL. Tubezone 06:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as above. "...awarded by the Guinness Book of Arab Records the title of being the only human being in the annals of history to have a perfectly symmetrical body". Whatever. -- IslaySolomon | talk 06:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Gotta speed, keed! Danny Lilithborne 11:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.