Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nottie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete, per consensus. -- xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 04:01, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nottie

This article, while scraping along at just above patent nonsense, is definitely a neologism. From the article, the term was "created" in January 2006. Further, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. See Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Isopropyl 22:15, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete in the absensce of (a) evidence of currency, (b) the name of the magazine and (c) any likelihood of me caring anyway, since it's clearly a bit of cruft. Just zis Guy you know? 23:04, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Chairman S. | Talk 23:05, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn and rather lame neologism. Fan1967 23:27, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Stupid, hurtful madeup article, possibly to generate traffic to the external links. Plus its a definition, thus dosen't belong on wikipedia. IF you improve the article then transwiki perhaps. Mike _{(T C)} 00:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable neologism that's really not even worth the few bytes of space it's taking up.  RasputinAXP  c 18:44, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.