This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete.Dmcdevit·t 07:41, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Pseudo-linguistic nonsense. Joyous(talk) 14:14, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
Delete I agree. Oliver Keenan 14:16, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
Keep Obviously I'd say that. freshgavin 23:19 07 08
Obviously you would, and just as obviously I'd vote delete.DS 14:34, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
The part about unhappy made me chuckle. Unkeep. Uncle G 15:12, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
Notkeep. It notmakes sense. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 15:35, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, neologism. Dcarrano 15:48, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
Delete neologism. JamesBurns 06:32, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.