Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notable anime review sites

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:36, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Notable anime review sites

Link farm; does not follow a single point of WP:LIST. SeizureDog 23:54, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- TheFarix (Talk) 01:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of anime & manga deletions. TheFarix (Talk) 01:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. In addition, it violates WP:NOT (1.5) and.. I cringe whenever I see the word 'notable' in an article title. Shiroi Hane 03:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:NOT a link directory. Comes very close to violating WP:CSD A3. ColourBurst 05:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. Zerophyte 10:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non manageable list. Saying "this is notable" does not make it so.WP:NOT :) Dlohcierekim 03:19, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
• I think the person who write this article had thier heart in the right place. It's a good attempt on concatenating the various non-notable anime site articles that we have into one, "notable" article. Anime fansites are hardly ever notable. ANN makes it because it is part of a magazine and it had a famous run-in with the RCMP, but there aren't too many other notables out there. --Kunzite 01:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.