Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norwich,Ct ghosts

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Paul August ☎ 20:34, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Norwich,Ct ghosts

Submitted to AfD as a coutesy to User:Jondel, as I undeleted this article he deleted as an invalid speedy deletion. His reason was: "nonsense" JesseW, the juggling janitor 07:42, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

• Jondel was right. Delete. Even if we were to accept that ghosts may exist this would be a meaningless non-article. Given that possibility is somewhat dubious as well, this becomes just wikijunk. ot to mention the title being pretty awful. Grutness...wha? 08:46, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN/Delete --TimPope 11:15, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, speedy if possible. This article is not usable. Deletion is the obvious result, why drag it through Afd? Friday (talk) 17:24, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Patent nonsense, a BJAODN candidate. Delete - candidate for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 20:19, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Comment is this really Wikipedia:Patent nonsense, i.e. "so completely and irredeemably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to make sense of it"? It seems more like "Partisan screed, or opinion masquerading as fact", "Religious excogitations", or "Incompetent and/or immature material", all of which are specifically mentioned as not being patent nonsense. If it is not speedable as patent nonsense, under which criteria is it speedyable? I'd really like to know, because I don't want to list any more pages on AfD than necessary. JesseW, the juggling janitor 01:15, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Nevertheless, Delete. It is a non-article, clearly. JesseW, the juggling janitor 01:15, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• delete', I regret having speedied but , AAAAAggh, I see patent nonsense everywhere, they (the contributers)don't know they are patent nonsense. *and the horror sinks in*--Jondel 02:33, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.