Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 19:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Northern group

Northern group (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

It's just a term - no reason to suggest why it should merit its own stand-alone article. Expansion of this would probably require synthesis violating WP:NOR. A merger could be appropriate if anyone can suggest a place. See the talk page for a minor critique of this term. There's no southern group article, and the two citations are inadequate for an encyclopedia article addressing the topic at hand.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 23:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC) h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 23:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Neutral Might be a bit of WP:NEO since the group is rather undefined even in the sources cited. However, if there are more recent EU politics sources that give it a more solid definition, I'd change to keep. Wl219 01:58, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless the sources mentioned above are found. The BBC article does not mention this term at all and the pdf file gives a 1 line passing mention, which is not enough for notability Corpx 04:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. It also includes false information, as Italy is a southern European country with a high GDP.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 20:47, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 00:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The EU Referendum blog has been writing about the EU for a few years in painful detail, and their site gives not hits to the term. If anyone would know, they would. MarkBul 02:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete - It's WP:NEO the term has acording to the provided sources only been used by a BBC article. This does not make this a legitimate term to describe the EU-states mentioned. What it comes down to is the list mentions nearly half the current member states of the EU. 1redrun Talk 11:28, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.