Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Nashville

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. (But I'll leave a redirect for each to Nashville...) — Scientizzle 15:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] North Nashville

North Nashville (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

South Nashville (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

West Nashville (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

East Nashville (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Little information on any of these related articles, and the last appears to take most if not all from a newspaper. I don't know if these are salvageable or expandable, given that Nashville, Tennessee could simply be added to. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 02:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Any objection to merging and redirecting as appropriate? If there's common usage of the term for these geographical reasons, it might merit coverage on its own, but if not, let's just split the difference. Somebody can always expand the article later if it's really appropriate. FrozenPurpleCube 05:20, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all. These are not recognized names for these areas, except to the same extent that most cities can be described as having areas that are "North," "South," "Central", etc. Surely the geographic terminology of "younger scenesters" is not considered encyclopedic.--orlady 05:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, recognized by who? The Nashville city gov't recognizes at least a few. There's [1] which covers the South part. Then there's East Nashville which has [2]. North Nashville [3] and [4] for the West. I think there's obvious usage, which to me, merits some description in the Nashville page, though I'm unconvinced of articles being supported on their own. I certainly think describing the geographical makeup of a city is valid and encyclopedic. Some cities may merit more than others (for example, New York City and London, but some individual paragraphs would work here. I don't know that "scenester" usage is, but that's not necessarily the case here. FrozenPurpleCube 08:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Note: Related article Nashville's Cityscape has been marked (by Huntster) for speedy deletion.--orlady 11:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Note²: Marked for deletion due to true lack of content, whereas these have the potential for fleshing out. At least, that's what I considered. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 12:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, as far as it goes, I'd at least rename the page to something like Geography of Nashville. Cityscape isn't commonly used. this would match up with Category:Geography by city as well. But deletion can work as well. FrozenPurpleCube 12:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - Every big city could be split up into parts based on geography. I fail to see any notability for these sections Corpx 04:00, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.