Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norouz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 02:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Norouz

Some Iranian users are removing the Kurdish Newroz article and by trying to merge it to Iranian article of Norouz. I wanr every body clarify for them that evey people have their own traditions and must be respected. If this article should stay then the Kurdish Newroz also should saty.Diyako Talk + 10:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy keep, the article is a current event, its complete and well cited, infact its celebrated today, there is no reason to delete it. --Kash 22:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy keep, obvious WP:POINT nomination. No opinion on the question of merger with Norouz. Bijí Newroz to everyone nevertheless, or whatever you guys prefer to call it now. Lukas ^(T.|@) 23:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep. It is well cited. --Sina Kardar23:06, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. This deletion proposal is not very fruitful for reaching a compromise on the Newros articles. There are no substantial arguments for deletion. Bertilvidet 23:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep.--Joe Dynue23:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep. as per above. --Fooladin23:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep. as stated above, it is a WP:POINT nominiation. -- Jeff3000 23:46, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• comment. I'm not sure what's going on here. It seems the nominator is not nominating deletion but somehow expects that we reject deletion in anticipation of someone else's nomination. I suggest that we not vote on deletion until someone actually proposes it. Bucketsofg 18:33, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep and close AfD as violation of WP:POINT... No reasoning for deletion of Norouz given. Dispute over Newroz merge discussion is ongoing and is not a reason for AfD. Suggest Diyako take it to RfC if this dispute can't be resolved. (I also fixed the nom "=")--Isotope23 20:22, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep - don't disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point. --Khoikhoi 04:15, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.