Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norn (Creatures)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Norn (Creatures)

Norn (Creatures) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete. Original research and not notable. Endless Dan 14:20, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom -- Keeper | 76 16:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, no indication of passing WP:FICT. --Dhartung | Talk 16:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - and merge (back?) what is salvageable into its proper section, the "Species" sub-heading of Creatures (artificial life program). ◄Zahakiel► 17:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete/merge, though I would leave open the possibility of writing a good referenced article about the creatures in the series of games. There are several published and even peer-reviewed sources out there by Steve Grand, but this does not use them and concentrates on trivia, which is best suited to Norn and Creature on Creatures Wiki. GreenReaper 18:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Steve Grand? --Endless Dan 18:49, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

AI/virtual life researcher, creator of the brain model behind Creatures. He was made an OBE for this and subsequent work in the field. GreenReaper 19:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - and, yes, what GreenReaper said. There were more than enough newspaper articles and the such at the time, too, but someone would have to hunt that all down in order to write an article which deserves inclusion, and the current article isn't really helpful. --Fuzzie (talk) 10:38, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.