Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nonexistence Time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Deleted by Neutrality (Per VfD)

[edit] Nonexistence Time

Crank rant, from the people who brought you Factual knowledge. It's nonexistence time for this article. --Zarquon 00:15, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

• Deletion Time. -Sean Curtin 01:19, May 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Whoa, far out dude. Delete. Gazpacho 01:22, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Since electrons cannot be destroyed or created, let us change the electrons storing this article into free electrons, where they can go into nonexistence chastity away from all those dirty positrons. Tinfoil hattery. Delete. Geogre 01:49, 15 May 2005 (UTC
• Delete, wtf ✏ OvenFresh² 02:17, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Where? How? Why When? Delete--Doc Glasgow 02:25, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Is this a passage from that computer-generated MIT article that got time at a major conference just because no one could understand it so they assumed it was scholarly? ESkog 02:37, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment - it looks like this user has also created Nonexistent Time. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than I could merge that into this VfD? ESkog 02:40, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Unless references are provided, Delete as original research. El_C 05:52, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. rant -MarSch 13:00, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy deleted. Incoherent nonsense. Neutrality^talk 16:30, May 15, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.