Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nondance Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both. Coredesat 03:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nondance Records

Nondance Records (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Ether Switch (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable label. Speedy denied due to apparently notable band Ether Switch but band isn't really notable either. Speedy on Ether Switch was denied only because it was the founder of Nondance Record. So the only claim either has to notability is that the other one is notable, but in reality neither is notable. Sbowers3 (talk) 22:36, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete both as nom - Sbowers3 (talk) 22:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete both, the band fails WP:MUSIC in every way and the label that they founded fails WP:CORP in every way. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete articles. Antics05 (talk) 00:04, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete both, WP:BAND, WP:MUSIC. Redfarmer (talk) 00:36, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete both as per the reasoning above. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 03:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete both per comprehensive reasoning of Sbowers3. tomasz. 14:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• Once again, I apologize. Clearly I misunderstood and I believe the artists misrepresented themselves to me. Is there any way I as the author can delete it myself? Antics05 (talk) 20:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.