Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-joke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was REDIRECT to anti-humor (technically there was a split between redirect and delete, but I took the liberty of redirecting it anyway.) Robert 00:45, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Non-joke

Not encyclopedic. Its mostly jokes in that page. Merge whatever useful info Joke and Delete --JAranda | watz sup 03:04, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Not encyclopedic, no salvageable infromation. I have added it to WP:BJAODN, and it can be viewed here. — Kjammer ⌂ 03:34, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I've had this on my watch list for some time now and basically every few days a user (usually an anon ip) comes along and adds a new unverifiable "non-joke" to the article. The only salvageable thing (maybe) is the "non-joke" from Kung Pow: Enter the Fist.--Kewp (t) 07:10, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Anti-humor, which covers the same phenomenon in a vastly more encyclopedic fashion. Penelope D 01:13, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per Penelope D. Andrew pmk | Talk 01:24, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete dicdef and not even good anti-jokes. --MacRusgail 19:00, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per Penelope D --Rogerd 01:01, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.