Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nom (pokemon)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Peacent 02:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nom (pokemon)
Creating AfD page for Lreford (talk · contribs), who added a link to this on today's AfD page but didn't create a corresponding entry first. Anyway, this is basically a hoax the creator claims is a Pokémon, but is obviously something made up in school one day. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 20:57, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions. -- -- pb30<talk> 21:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, fairly obvious nonsense. The pic says it all. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 22:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unsourced non-sense. --Cheers, Komdori 22:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as made up in school one day. The picture's awesome, though. Useight 00:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)'
- Delete per above. Blatant parody, perhaps even subtle vandalism. --Nonstopdrivel 00:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Comment These kind of articles detract from serious, scholarly work being done in the field of Pokemon research. ~ Infrangible 01:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Ha, that was the best thing I've read all day. Useight 16:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. It's an unreal pokemon. Bigtop 01:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Nom (get it?), and because I can't find an exclusion to WP:HOAX for things that are really, really hilarious. I'd love to keep it just to see how many people we can get to go thru the steps of trying to catch one. Capmango 17:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.