Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Node.london

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Node.london

Part of this article is a copyright violation of [1]. On the talk page [[User:]] claims that its released for fair use, but provides no evidence of this and says "i am a member of node.london. please simply look at what N.O.D.E stands for. copyright does not exsist for the text." The user has removed speedy tags, prods, and copyright violation tags. The sources are: a subscription only magazine website, a reader published by the group that the article is about, and an Italian site that doesn't work. There is no established notability, it does not meet WP:ORG, there are no verifable independent, reliable sources, and there is the copyright violations as well. Metros232 13:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. I've replaced the copyvio tag, since it's still a copyvio. There's an assertion of permission, though, so CSD A8 wouldn't apply. The site seems to be about a meeting/event that took place in March of this year, so I highly doubt this is covered in reliable, independent sources. Mangojuice^talk 14:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete with a nuclear weapon Unless the author can provide proof of his claims, this is a clear copyright violation. Anything else I would say Mango already has. Good work! --Brian ^{(How am I doing?)} 14:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and give the user a vacation as well for his behaviour here.--Crossmr 15:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - no sources for establishing notability, and no concrete evidence to support copyright assertions despiet repeated requests. -- Whpq 16:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a copyvio for a non-notable event. Temp-block the article creator for vandalism. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 19:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.