Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NobleTrading

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NobleTrading

NobleTrading (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Only indication of notability is of dubious importance, and is unreferenced. Article reads like an advertisement and says little that would not apply to any brokerage firm. —dgies^t_c 06:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete' - cannot find anything that satisfies the notability requirement of non-trivial published works. Fails WP:CORP - Peripitus (Talk) 09:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: no sign of reliable sources as required by attribution --Pak21 11:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, zero references, no visible notability. MaxSem 14:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as above. Fails all requirements. Alex43223 ^{Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C} 23:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep

User:Nobletrade appears to be unfamiliar with the AfD process and posted this to their user page. In the spirit of open debate, I present it below. —dgies^t_c 02:41, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete this article on NobleTrading. This article is based on the services offered to customers rather than being promotional.

NobleTrading is the one and only brokerage firm that offers OTCBB traders to place their orders online through their Level 2 direct access trading platform (OTCBB Stock Trading Online). Nobletrade 02:24, 10 March 2007

• Keep - I know NobleTrading, they provide some unique services and lot of information through their blogs. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Praveen Ortec (talk • contribs).
  • Comments: 1) This !vote moved from Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/NobleTrading. 2) This is Praveen Ortec's first edit to Wikipedia. --Pak21 14:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.