Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nixon: Ruin and Recovery 1973-1990

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. bainer (talk) 02:41, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nixon: Ruin and Recovery 1973-1990

This was speedily deleted, but Deletion Review concluded that it should not have been and sent it here instead. -Splashtalk 19:09, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Hm...not entirely sure about this one. Check this Amazon page out. It seems to me the only reason it didn't garner more notoriety on Amazon was that it came out some 6 years before Amazon itself became notable. For now, I vote a weak keep with a cleanup until someone can slap my logic about the head. JHMM13 19:37, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not a sufficiently notable biography. Take any relevant info and put it in Stephen Ambrose. David | Talk 19:49, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
    • I agree with this since it seems more sensible to merge with the author's article. Delete JHMM13 19:57, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Certainly, this article is certainly worthy of deletion under A1. Merge with our Stephen Ambrose article until such time as a real article can be written about this book which in my view would warrant a legitimate article. This isn't it. Capitalistroadster 20:01, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, expanded into a full stub. Christopher Parham (talk) 01:34, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep; seems to be a reasonably notable book. *Dan T.* 06:05, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment - I would feel better about this if the other 2 books were also given articles/stubs. Bill shannon 02:51, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, book by notable author. Kappa 02:32, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.