Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nitro Mega Prayer (2nd nominaton)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. They are notable in their country, as EliminatorJR pointed out. Non-admin closure. Boricuaeddie 16:03, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nitro Mega Prayer

Nitro Mega Prayer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I am only fixing the AfD as nominator did not fully do the AfD. Nominator is Guroadrunner and did not leave a reason for deletion. I hope he comes back to this to give a reason sumnjim ^{talk with me·changes} 16:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Nomination reason -- I am nominating this because of lack of notability and failure to meet WP:MUSIC. Guroadrunner 21:41, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Delete per nom Sawblade05 17:43, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

• I'm seeing a definite trend in your votes. Did you even read the nom? --Action Jackson IV 18:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
• per what nom, exactly? ELIMINATORJR ^TALK 20:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
• This is one of the most-informed and well-reasoned "votes" ever. </sarcasm> —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 07:07, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Need to keep WP:CSB in mind here because I suspect most sources will be in Japanese here. Nevertheless, they've released at least one album on a well-regarded Japanese record label; they've toured extensively in their own country; at least one CD has been re-released by a US label; and they've toured the US [1]. I'd say they're a keep. ELIMINATORJR ^TALK 20:46, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment I've incorporated the link you provided into the article as a reference. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:45, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep per EliminatorJR. Thanks for spelling it out for us. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 07:07, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep I agree with the WP:CSB argument up to a point, that point being determination if there is an article on the Japanese Wikipedia for the band, which might be more developed or contain references. I've put a question to this effect on the article's talk page ... though perhaps there is a better way of soliciting assistance of this kind? --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:37, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.