Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nitin Gupta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nitin Gupta

  ATTENTION!

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}
Nitin Gupta (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non notable. Claim to notability seems to be that he likes protesting. SmashvilleBONK! 23:23, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Narson (talk) 00:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
  • DO NOT DELETE: Protesting peacefully for democratic rights is not wrong. He is a leader in making. For thousands, he already is a leader. PAges like these should not be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.143.142 (talk) 10:50, 27 December 2007 (UTC) Struck comment by blocked sockpuppet — Coren (talk)
  • DONT DELETE: Whats wrong in protesting in a legal and peaceful way? These protests should have a motive behind them, or they wont be successful. This page should not be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachin1978 (talk • contribs) 10:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC) Struck comment by blocked sockpuppet — Coren (talk)
  • MUST NOT BE DELETED: He is an important member of Indian community/south asian community in Melbourne. MUst not be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guriyashampi (talk • contribs) 11:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC) Struck comment by blocked sockpuppet — Coren (talk)
  • KEEP: This article should not be deleted. This man has changed the taxi industry of Melbourne. He has been fighting for the rights of Melbourne's Taxi Drivers.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dksindhi (talk • contribs) 12:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. The sources provided do not confirm that this person meets the notability criteria, and I googled for sources that would confirm this person's importance and couldn't find any. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - likely self promotional, next to no RS, non-notable. Orderinchaos 22:10, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, no independent secondary sources establishing notability. Willing to change my vote if some can be found. Lankiveil (talk) 02:18, 28 December 2007 (UTC).
  • Comment: I searched The Age, Sydney Morning Herald and ABC, and can't find any mention of this guy.Lester 05:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

KEEP: This article should be kept. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.164.87 (talk) 08:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Strong Delete and SALT] By the number of sock/meatpuppets and anon IP's commenting here, I can just tell this is going to be a problem article down the road. I can't find any materials to demonstrate the subjects notability, and it just reads like a whole bunch of vanispam or whatever variant of cruft you can think of. Let's deal with this now so it doesn't come back to AfD in a few weeks time. Thewinchester (talk) 12:37, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOTABILITY. -Sharkface217 22:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:BIO. Precious Roy (talk) 01:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.