Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo On
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — Trilobite (Talk) 03:26, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Nintendo On
- Delete,little about the game itself.Wonglokking
Hard to describe, but it's certainly not encyclopedic RoySmith 20:56, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
- Imaginary video game console?! Delete this! - Thatdog 21:01, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, hoax/unverifiable. Dcarrano 05:12, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, hardly worthwhile keeping an article on an imaginary console. --Atratus 09:15, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete; imaginary console, poor article quality, seems to be copied from a website... July 10
- Delete; the video was a pretty good hoax, but a hoax nevertheless. Delete per Atratus. Jaxl 19:39, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete; was kind of notable a while ago, but not now. Thunderbrand 22:51, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Nn. Sounds like an advertisement for the forum too. -- BMIComp (talk) 22:59, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete non notable advertising. JamesBurns 07:51, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Advertisement, non-notable, not encyclopedic. --Blu Aardvark 07:53, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and cleanup. Hoax or not, it was a notable event. --Breathstealer 15:18, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and cleanup. As Breathstealer said above, it was quite well notable. I can do the cleanup if nobody else is willing to... Robertos Consuelos Garcias 00:52, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and cleanup. It was a huge fan creation, and it's as noteworthy as any important news piece. It made an impact on all of the game reporters, and even on Nintendo. Reggie Fils-Aime even said that he wanted to be contacted by the creator. Blinkstale
-
- The above vote signed by Blinkstale appears to have been actually made by User:67.169.16.216. RoySmith 14:32, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.