Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimf

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 07:26, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nimf

Already have nymphomaniac and this is at best a neologism. Do not redirect to hypersexuality or any page that redirects to it. Splash 14:26, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

• Google test useless due to foreign languages, apparently. Keyword searches coupled with hypersexuality return zilch. From what the article says, I'd suggest a redirect, but you said something about that (what do you mean by don't redirect to redirect?) Ambush Commander 15:34, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

• Sorry, I meant that I didn't think it should be redirected to e.g. nymphomaniac which is a redirect to hypersexuality. I clarified my comment.

• Note also that it is, as created, also a personal attack - on "Kristie Newbold" and "Bill Wright". I removed these, but still note that, as it exists, the entry is completely plagiarised from the Hypersexuality article's opening paragraph. Strong delete. jglc | t | c 16:05, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism. --Carnildo 21:05, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.