Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nilla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 04:37, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nilla

A consensus was reached at DRV to overturn the speedy deletion of this article [1]. This is a procedural nomination so I abstain. Thryduulf 15:44, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, and separate Nilla Wafers, which are notable in their own right. --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as it has indeed become genericatized. FrozenPurpleCube 16:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - per above - AfDs are getting ridiculous! PT ^(s-s-s-s) 20:10, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. Meets the requirements for product notability. Original speedy was nonsense.Cynical 22:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per the above. No disrespect to the nominator as I understand this is just a procedural listing, but this is an obviously notable product worth documenting on Wikipedia. RFerreira 01:00, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Dunne409 01:49, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per being notable. I'm surprised this article is an unreferenced stub since this is a well-known US brand. Now that it's on my radar, I'll happily work on it. - Lex 19:20, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Yum! Grindingteeth 14:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.