Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikonian

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS.

The votes were 3 keep, 3 delete. I didn't count Paul Fischer, since his vote was his first contribution. dbenbenn | talk 22:44, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nikonian

Non-notable forum. Linking to the webpage three times in a one-paragraph article is a sign of vanity. RickK 23:24, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, website advertisement, neologism, article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 02:13, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Retain, word is in fairly common use on internet photography sites (not just nikonians.org). Article has been edited to make it more encyclopedic.--Paul Fisher 03:12, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, first impression is a complete yawn, but this article describes a popular and helpful website. Wyss 22:24, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• keep. Yuckfoo 01:21, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, looks notable. Bart133 (t) 02:12, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Should have an entry in wikidictionary plus the website is supported by Nikon max rspct 23:11, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.