Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikonian (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Nakon 02:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nikonian

Nikonian (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Notability. The "Nikonian" and "Nikonians" web sites have not received significant or substantive coverage outside of their self-same community forums. The article does not reference any sources outside of these two sites. This article occasionally sees a reintroduction of the claim that "Nikonians" is a general term for Nikon users, but the term is a trade mark, and the claim is never supported by a reference.

• Delete No reliable sources, no notability. Beeblbrox (talk) 01:12, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete For all reasons stated so far. --Stybn (talk) 01:17, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete and Partial Merge A brief mention may be made on the Nikon article, if some notability can be established. Rotovia (talk) 02:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
• Merge I agree with the user above. A small (the article is small anyway) mention in the main Nikon article. Noble Story (talk) 07:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete original research--Pustefix (talk) 18:22, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 20:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete No WP:RS, fails WP:WEB and WP:N Gary King (talk) 19:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.