Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nike Impax Dime

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nike Impax Dime

Do we have articles on individual shoe models? If we do, we probably don't have ones written in quite these terms. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 20:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

• We've got Chuck Taylor All-Stars. But I don't think we've got room for advertising. Delete.--み使い Mitsukai 20:45, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

I am new to this so if you want to delete this article feel free because i'm working on new ones. -BallaCM

• Delete as nn.Blnguyen 03:07, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, I see nothing notable about this model, even to merge. By the way, on top of Chuck Taylor All-Stars, we're got Adidas 1, Dunk (footwear), Reebok Freestyle and Nike Air Max, but they're all iconic, long-survived, or somehow interesting. Actually, I'm not sure about that last one. ×Meegs 23:53, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. I have no problem with an individual shoe model having an article - so long as the shoe is somehow notable. Otherwise it's just spam. Ifnord 23:30, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.