Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nightwolf's Pokémon Program Suite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 03:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NW's Pokémon Program Suite

Non-notable Pokémon index, and a vanity article (primary author of the article is also ONE OF the authors of the program). Zetawoof^(ζ) 01:16, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Doesn't seem notable enough, written by himself Wizrdwarts (T|C|E) 01:25, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Proof? Nightwolf 04:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom--Nick Y. 01:26, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, vanity. --Coredesat 01:50, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Proof? Nightwolf 04:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above -- Where 03:11, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Jammo (SM247) 04:50, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Rob 11:23, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• "Downloading and using the program is entirely free." ZOMG!!1!1 *runs off excitedly* DELETE--^Triana_C 11:25, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity and non-notable content doktorb | words 11:54, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Proof? Nightwolf 04:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Gotta love it when the "for short" acronym takes longer to pronounce than the actual name. And longer than the syllables: "blatant fanivanicruft" --DaveG12345 19:22, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as complete bollocks. Just zis Guy you know? 21:39, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • As much as I like that essay, the article does appear to describe something real... more or less. Zetawoof^(ζ) 22:38, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. FailsWP:SOFTWARE. ~Chris | e@ 00:25, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Proof? Nightwolf 04:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 19:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 19:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. - Wickning1 00:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - You have no real proof, This is the users first article so you should show some human compassion, Which you guys surely... lack... Nightwolf is not the total Author, He only posted it... It is a copy of an article posted on his own Wiki. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.72.148.103 (talk • contribs) .
• Keep - Not Notable? Written mostly by him? I am offended, Me and Nightwolf wrote that thing. That is just another blatant attack on Nightwolf. If you can do better than do It yourself. DarkBlastoise 01:42, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

  Comment. Tf? I don't even know this guy, okay? The only reason it's up for deletion because I prodded it for the second time for not being notable, since it fails WP:SOFTWARE. Also, the only "keeps" are an IP and the 2 article writers. Wizrdwarts (T|C|E) 04:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep At least till next friday, So some required changes can be made. Nightwolf 03:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Blatant vanity and advertisement. No amount of changes would make this article appropriate. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 04:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm just asking for a little time, of course if your going to be selfish I will just get my entire user base to vote 'Keep'. As a user has already said if you can do better than do it yourself. Nightwolf 05:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
    • No amount of time or rewriting can make this an encyclopedic subject. It's Just Another Fan Program of little note. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 05:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
      • What about NetBattle? Little note? Where is the proof? I want server logs, memos, emails all that stuff. "No amount of rewriting?" I beg to differ. Looks at above reply
        • Netbattle has been covered by Gamespot and IGN and has spawned multiple sites dedicated to players. Yours hasn't. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 05:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
          • Sigh, Maybe so, I want server logs, memos, emails all that stuff, . —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NightwolfAA2k5 (talk • contribs) .
            • Why? What dothey have to do with anything? - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 06:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
              • Not notable, No-one uses it, I'm asking for proof they don't. Nightwolf 06:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Fast Delete Delete this ASAP, I have had enough, some have said It's fine, Some have said it isn't. I give up. I just give up. I have had enough, ENOUGH. GOODBYE! Nightwolf 06:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. HotWings 18:50, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.