Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nightmare Kinetics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 23:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nightmare Kinetics

Nightmare Kinetics (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Multiple pages about Mike Bohatch and/or his endeavors have been started and written by the same user without using references, without credibly establishing notability and while adding multiple and inappropriate links to external sites. This article appears to be autobiographical and exist to provide monetary gain to the subject. Related pages—Mike Bohatch, Eyes of Chaos and linkspam). Parhamr 02:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete No claim of notability and no sources to back it up. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 02:16, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable. Keeps adding himself to articles which he doesn't belong.--Weakmassive 02:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. No indication of notability. Vassyana 04:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete The company/individual has apparently done the main titles on 3 horror films which have been released and 2 more in the works per IMDB. Weak so far on notability is concerned. Myspace and a company website do not satisfy WP:A at all and IMDB is borderline. Get written up in the press and recreate the article. Edison 16:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. More Kentucky-fried spam. Realkyhick 20:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. So what if the guy has done the titles on three grade-B movies? What's next, an article on each of the 10,000 Hollywood caterers out there? The recent habit of listing everybody on down to the shoeshine boys on film credits is really lame, and doesn't need to be reproduced here.Qworty 20:30, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.