Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigger guy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to With Apologies to Jesse Jackson. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-14 11:28Z

[edit] Nigger guy

Nigger guy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

It doesn't even deserve its own page as it is not worthy of it. Just because it's from South Park does not give it the special right to a page. If it should be on any page it should be under the South Park episode article or Nigger article. Laeek 21:02, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete non-notable neologism, not even worth keeping on a South Park article. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 21:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. ↔NMajdan•talk 21:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete it would not surprise me if a good editor could turn this into a valid neologism, but this article is more confusion than information. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 21:36, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to With Apologies to Jesse Jackson, not notable enough to merit a seperate article.--TBCΦtalk? 22:10, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to With Apologies to Jesse Jackson per WP:NEO. A very newly created (3 days ago) neologism, which as far as I know is yet to appear anywhere else in the media besides the show. The article in its current context doesn't offer more than the episode article on the subject, nor qualifies for a merge anywhere else. Michaelas10 (Talk) 22:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect way too short article. -Toastypk
  • Redirect to With Apologies to Jesse Jackson the term "Ginger Kids" and "Ginger People" redirects to the South Park episode that uses these terms. The same should apply here. - 75.19.63.116 23:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NEO. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 23:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect per TBC and others. Bucketsofg 00:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary. Woogums 00:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect, if we can't make it go away, at least make it go somewhere. Shenme 04:38, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Even though it is something that is reference to on South Park it is NOT Encyclopedia. They call me Mr. Pibb 05:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect People referring to may not be very likely to remember the episode specifically as "With Apologies to Jesse Jackson", but plenty will remember it as "the nigger guy episode". Mwelch 09:53, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect, on account that it will serve as a useful redirect for those unsure of the episode title, and those looking for the episode guide. Doctorbob 20:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete, racial neologicism. --Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 21:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect per all the reasons given so far. People may very well search for this, but they want the article With Apologies to Jesse Jackson instead. Remember Wikipedia policies: redirects are cheap. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 23:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - per WP:NEO. M.G. In Da Hizzhouse 00:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect and barring that Delete. A phrase used in one episode of South Park that at this time has no notability outside of the show's sphere of influence does not warrant its own article. (→Netscott) 00:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as useless nonsense. Why is there even any debate? Captain Infinity 00:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect- definitely does not deserve its own article.Hoponpop69 04:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - no redirect. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 17:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to the original episode- With Apologies to Jesse Jackson. I think its pointless to try and stand up for keeping it as noone else feels that way, so lets just redirect it to its original source.
  • Delete fails WP:NEO. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 02:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.