Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigerian vs american civil war

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Article has already been deleted. Joyous 03:14, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nigerian vs american civil war

Original research, unencyclopedic, nonsense, marginal speedy but I don't think it qualifies tbh. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 00:02, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: original research, and needs a lot of clean-up to boot, almost a top-to-bottom rewrite. Maybe it can be condensed into a paragraph or two for the Nigeria article? 23skidoo 00:11, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: not nonsense, just terribly misguided original research. Despite the title, it's mostly about the Nigerian civil war, mentioning the American civil war only in passing. Some of this might be salvageable for the main article, but not without rewriting, and a redirect makes no sense — so no point in voting Merge. JRM 01:15, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)
• Delete, original research. Rje 01:30, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Neutrality^talk 01:53, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Illegible. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 03:33, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, original research fails Google Test. Megan1967 03:45, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Original research TigerShark 03:47, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Someone's unencyclopedic school paper. Szyslak 05:24, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as original research with no evidence of peer review and just about the poorest excuse for writing I've read all year. What a disaster. Wyss 04:08, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.